Jerusalem Center for Social & Economic Rights

Jerusalem Center for Social & Economic Rights

ANNUAL REPORT 1999

 


The Status of Human Rights in Occupied East Jerusalem and a Chronicle of the Activities of JCSER


Contents

The Jerusalem Centre for Social and Economic Rights

The Jerusalem Centre for Social and Economic is a non-profit Human Rights Organisation headquartered in Jerusalem. It has been founded in the late 1997 upon the initiative of a number of Palestinian lawyers and human rights activists interested in the issues of human rights and Jerusalem. The center was founded to challenge Israeli discriminatory policy against the indigenous inhabitants of this land and defend Palestinian residency rights in Jerusalem, where the Israeli policy of 'judaisation' has long been condemned as being contradictory to all international agreements and covenants related to human rights and issued by the UN including the resolutions related to the city of Jerusalem as occupied territory.

In order to guarantee the protection of human rights, the center has undertaken to monitor and document Israeli Human rights violations against Palestinian in the Holy City and provide free legal assistance for the needy. The center has also undertaken to conduct specialised studies which shed more light on the realities of social and economic life of Jerusalemites, spread legal awareness among the public to better acquaint with their rights and the existing laws and regulations valid in the city in addition to familiarising them with international laws related to human rights.

The center also provides the right to defend oneself in Israeli courts and provides them the right to be legally represented through the center's lawyers or second a lawyer to represent their cases depending on the degree of complexity. In this context, the center guarantees the protection of residency and housing rights in addition to the entitlement to services, education, medical care and other entitlements from the National Security Agency. The center seeks to eliminate the obnoxious policy of home demolition, ID card confiscation, illegal practices of the Arnona tax authorities and the various discriminatory policies against the indigenous Palestinian, residents of Arab Jerusalem.

The center has undertaken some 'experiment cases' and lodged complaints at Israeli court of several types including the High Court. The center has succeeded in creating legal precedents over several issues related to social and economic rights pertaining to the Arab population of East Jerusalem.

The center also organises and participates in conferences and workshops that mainly deal with human rights issues against Palestinians in Jerusalem during which the organisers expose these violations and question the underlying discriminatory laws. The center views Jerusalem as occupied territory under the international law and therefore seeks to apply all agreements related to applicable laws during the period of occupation to secure international legitimacy in the Holy City.

The Jerusalem Center for Social and Economic Rights is an affiliate of the Coalition against Home Demolition, Coalition for the defence of Jerusalem, and the Coalition against the ID Card Withdrawal.

Introduction

Since Israel's occupation of Jerusalem in 1967, the city and its Palestinian residents have been subjected to orchestrated Israeli violation of their most basic rights. The occupying power has dedicated itself to coercive annexation and evacuation of the holy city's indigenous population. This policy has inevitably left its traces on the Palestinian residents of the city, as it is enforced by way of the most blatant discrimination.

The Jerusalem Centre for Social and Economic rights was founded to challenge Israeli discriminatory policy against the indigenous inhabitants of this land, defend Palestinian residency rights in Jerusalem, protect their rights and provide free legal assistance.

In its first report, the Jerusalem Centre for Social and Economic rights demonstrates the most prominent cases of violations in occupied Arab Jerusalem, the extent of damage they cause to international agreements and covenants, particularly those related to human rights. This report also includes an overview of free legal assistance which the center had provided to its clients since its establishment in December 1997 to this present day.

A description of Israeli Human Rights Violations in the city of Jerusalem:

Since Israel's occupation of Jerusalem in 1967, the city and its Palestinian residents have been subjected to orchestrated Israeli violation of their most basic rights. The occupying power has dedicated itself to coercive annexation and evacuation of the holy city's indigenous population, in the name of 'judaisation'. This policy has inevitably left its traces on the Palestinian residents of the city, as it is enforced by way of the most blatant discrimination. This policy was followed in al- Magharbeh neighbourhood whereby the Palestinian residents were expelled from their native city and had their houses demolished to be replaced by new housing for Jewish residents. This is in addition to the 70,500 dunums of land that was annexed by Israel and incorporated into West Jerusalem. That part of annexed land was forced under Israeli jurisdiction and regulations in a discriminatory manner orchestrated against the indigenous and legitimate population - a policy based on the grab of Palestinian property, and the evacuation of the Arab population to be replaced by Jews - individuals, groups and institutions. These basis have formed the core of Israeli policy along the years of occupation until this present day in an attempt to judaize the city and dedicate total annexation. In this context, Israeli procedures have diversified and violations have multiplied against the indigenous population.

The most prominent violations can be summarised as follows:

Confiscation of Property and dedication of coercive Annexation
Israeli successive governments have sustained their adverse policies against Palestinians and their property though illegal means based on the supremacy of the occupier and in total contradiction to international laws and regulations. Today, 34% of land has been confiscated and 52% declared 'green' or 'wasteland', where construction is forbidden for Arabs whilst it remains a strategic reserve for settlement expansion in the future. This reserve has been had been recently used to build ,more settlements as is the case in Jabal Abu Ghneim, Shu'fat and many others. Settlement expansion and construction is usually at the expense of the Palestinian property in Jerusalem and at the expense of the needs for construction to meet the processes of natural growth.

In other measures, Israel has imposed a property tax on personal property investments that have not been exploited and had been declared 'green' or on the property whose owners have not used due to financial difficulties or military orders banning construction or problems in settling inheritance issues. The Israeli Jerusalem Municipality has also imposed very high fees and impossible conditions to obtain construction licenses. The fees were imposed reactively. It has often happened that the landlords were unable to pay the fees. The tax authorities have filed against the landlords and had their properties sold in public auctions. The properties usually fall in the hands of settlers who are more than happy to pay astronomical sums of money in order to own them as is the case in the properties of southern and northern parts of the city. An estimated 34% of land have been confiscated under the cover of ' public interest'. An estimated 15 settlements have been built on this confiscated land in addition to 9 agricultural installations, and 100 light and heavy industries.

During the last years, Israel has carried three main campaigns to expand the Jerusalem borders. The first was in the aftermath of the 1967 war and included 70 Km sq., 108.5 Km Sq. in the West. The second took place in 1982 in what was called the project of the center. The third had taken place before an official declaration of the projects; a plan endorsed by the Israeli Government in June 1998 to expand the Jerusalem borders by annexing all the surrounding settlements and connecting them together at the expense of Palestinian property. This plan is known as the Great Jerusalem or the Metropolitan plan. According to the plan, the Jerusalem borders will eat up some of the land in the West Bank and will extend to Jericho in the east, Ramallah in the north, and the northern parts of the distirct of Hhebron in the south of the West Bank. The area within the borders of Great Jerusalem is expected to be bound to 850 Km Sq.

Blatant Discrimination against the indigenous residents
The remaining Palestinians are only allowed to build on 14% of Arab Jerusalem. Construction of Palestinian property is subject to impossible conditions and often lack facilitation. The remaining property has already been used by the settlers to construct their own housing and the rest of the land had been sealed off and characterised as green areas where construction is not allowed. Since 1967, Israeli occupation authorities have allowed 10,492 housing units to be built for Palestinians, while settlers have built 71, 600 units in the Eastern Arab part of the city. This, in addition to 35, 000 housing units which had been planned making it 7 times more than what Palestinians had been allowed to build in their own native city despite the desperate need for housing. Palestinian residents of the city have been suffering a housing crisis in the city pushing those who own plots of land to build their houses without having to obtain Israeli licenses, while the others who do not own land have been pushed outside the municipal borders. During the last 45 years, more than 400 demolition orders have been issued against Arab houses, of which 144 have been implemented to date.

There are 1,400 houses inside the old city of Jerusalem in desperate need of maintenance and renovation. 356 of these houses are on the verge of collapse, due to negligence, lack of services, a ban in renovation and recent archaeological excavations carried out by the Israeli Municipality.

In the context of severing the city from other Palestinian cities and banning entry into it since 1993, the residents have been forced to pay a heavy price for this isolation. According to Israeli figures, the percentage of people living below the poverty was 40% in 1997, while 35% are permanently unemployed, mainly due to the revocation of the social and economic rights of Palestinians inside and outside the city. Many Palestinian residents of the city have been subjected to various punitive measures for being unable to pay the taxes. These measures have ranged from imprisonment, to seizure of property. Among other high taxes, the Arnona tax is probably the most obnoxious which in the event of failing to pay, the Israeli courts impose a retroactive manner in addition to the fines of the delays. The Arnona is the tax paid for occupying space in the city of Jerusalem collected by the municipality in return for the services. According to figures collected by the Jerusalem centre for social and cultural rights, the taxes levied by the municipality from Arab residents account for approximately 30% of the city's yearly revenue, but only 5% is diverted back to them in the form of services. This tax surpasses the financial means of 90% of the Arab Jerusalemite population. The tax is based on a principle of equality between the Palestinian traders and Israelis, whose businesses and incomes are inevitably more successful than their Palestinian counterparts. Moreover, the services given to the eastern side are comparatively much smaller than those given to the western side. If the municipality maintains this policy of discrimination and high taxation, it will eventually evacuate the city. This policy has negatively affected the movement of trade and caused several SMEs to close within and around the Old City of Jerusalem due to high taxes. Of the 1,000 shops in the Old City, 250 have now closed.

In this context, Arab Jerusalem suffer 50% deficiency of services in its infra-structure while the policy of discrimination has affected all the aspects of life. Israel forces the Israeli syllabus onto Arab schools.

There is a shortage of 344 classrooms, which adds to the already-existing problems in education and has forced education to regress to 32 years ( the period of occupation from 1967) in comparison with the educational system in West Jerusalem and the subsidy and progress with which it was nourished compared to that in the Easter part of the city.

Not one hotel has been built during the occupation. Palestinians are not permitted to publish their own brochures on tourism. Instead, tourists receive Israeli publications which tend to distort or forge historical facts about the city of Jerusalem. Israel has long monopolised the information that is distributed to tourists and has for long used Israeli tour guides to show the tourists inside Jerusalem.

Revoking Residency Rights
Arab Jerusalemites are constantly examined by the Israeli Ministry of Interior that has taken upon itself to punish those who do not comply with the Israeli regulations. Such a policy has become a daily practice through which the Arabs have been treated as 'residents under special conditions', residents who actually precede the Israelis. The Arabs are treated as aliens in their own native city. Arabs have to prove the location of their residence. If they are suspected, they have to provide documents to prove their residency inside the city for at least 7 years.

According to Israeli non-official figures, which are also confirmed by Human Rights Organisations, an estimated 20, 000 Palestinian children have been deprived of being registered as Jerusalemites, followers of their own parents.

The culmination of withdrawing ID cards culminated at the end of 1995 when the Ministry issued orders to revoke the residency rights of every carrier of an Israeli card (Jerusalemites) who were found to live outside the municipal borders. This is done under the cover of the Law of Entry to Israel. The Law has no legal justification and is often ruled by the moods of the staff of the Ministry of Interior. In general, the requirement to prove that Jerusalem is the 'centre of life' is ambiguous and full of gaps which are often exploited by the staff of the Ministry to revoke residency rights of Arab Jerusalemites and deprive them of the social benefits and other entitlements, thus inflicting heavy financial, and health damage.

According to figures released by the Jerusalem Unit For Social and Economic Rights, Israeli authorities have withdrew 4000 ID cards in the last four years. In some cases, residency rights are revoked without the knowledge of the people concerned. The Unit affirmed that 70, 000 Jerusalmites are threatened to be expelled from their own city if the regulation to prove that Jerusalem is one's life centre is totally implemented.

In this context, Israel makes no secrets of its adverse policy which relies on maintaining demographic supremacy in the eastern part of the city and keeping the Arab population restricted to not more than 25%. The Israeli successive governments have allocated big sums of money to hasten the pace of settlement activity in the holy city. They have also formed what came to be called as 'the Jerusalem Fund' headed by the Director General of the Housing Ministry which aims to build an many housing units as possible in Jerusalem. An estimated 110, 000 housing units are expected to be completed By the year 2001 to be able to maintain the demographic balance dedicated to the process of 'Judaization' of the city and consolidating the coercive annexation.

Israeli policies in the city race with time in order to create a reality on the ground prior to the final political settlement. These policies contravene with international laws, agreements and UNSC resolutions which confirm that Jerusalem is an occupied city. Viewed through international standards, Israeli policies and violations have been regarded illegal, illegitimate and discriminatory. As a matter of fact, these policies have divided the city into two parts contrary to the idea of a unified city as Israel has been claiming.

The Jerusalem centre for Social and Cultural rights views these policies as blatant violations to the basic human rights such as the right to housing, freedom of movement and the right to employment. Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stipulates that 'Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.' They have also been reiterated in articles 12 B and 12 D in the International Covenant for Social and Cultural Rights.

According to international Law, Israel is an occupying power and Jerusalem is an occupied city. Israel should fulfil the commitments of the agreements including the Fourth Geneva Convention in which Israel is a signatory among 188 states. Israel is bound by the articles l1-22, 27, 29-34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 55, 59, 61-77 of the Convention. International resolution have affirmed the necessity for Israel to comply with the provision articulate in all the international agreements related to Palestine including the city of Jerusalem.

Legal services

During the period covered by this report, the Jerusalem Center for Social and Economic Rights has provided all possible legal services for Jerusalemites whether in representing them in courts of different types or in addressing the official parties about their problems or through holding awareness raising workshops. Since its establishment in December 1997, the center has adopted 1232 cases, a monthly average of 61 cases per month. These cases included 344 cases of reunification permits, 314 cases of National Insurance problems, 485 cases of Arnona tax and 89 miscellaneous cases including home demolitions and political detentions.

The legal team of the center has lodged hundreds of complaints, objections and notes to the competent parties either for reminding or following up or examining. Below is a model of these cases which have been adopted and examined by the center.

Cases of family reunification permits and National Insurance:

Case 1: Mariam Kalambo
This case was filed at the Center on 25 June 1998. The Israeli Ministry of Interior has refused to register Mariam's son, Mohammed, 10, on her ID card, or to grant him a birth certificate. Mariam was born in Jerusalem in 1967 and has lived there ever since, in the area close to the Dome of the Rock. She works at a school in Jerusalem. She has been trying to register her son as a Jerusalemite for the past ten years but has been unable to do so, causing many problems for both mother and child, especially for school registration and medical care. The Center has obtained all the necessary documents to prove his right to residency in Jerusalem. On 16 March 1999, the Center was able to obtain approval from the Ministry to register the son as a Jerusalemite and grant him a Jerusalem birth certificate.

Case 2: Rasila Arajabi
Rasila filed her complaint at the Center on 12 November 1998, because the Ministry of Interior refused to register her newborn daughter, Samira, on Rasila's ID. Her National Security allowance was interrupted, under the pretext that she does not live in Jerusalem. The mother was also deprived of the allowance for giving birth. The Center took on her case and followed it up to prove the National Insurance Agency wrong in its claims. On 24 January 1999, the Center obtained a court order for the baby to be registered on her mother's ID and granted a Jerusalem birth certificate. The NIA refused to comply fully with the court order, so another hearing has been scheduled for 20 October 1999.

Case 3: Wael Abu Sneineh
Abu Sneineh filed his complaint at the Center on 1 December 1998. He has been trying in vain to obtain a reunification permit for his wife Sana since 1994, because the Ministry of Interior argues that Abu Sneineh has been living beyond the municipal boundary. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove Abu Sneineh's residency in Jerusalem. On 30 December 1998, the Center's lawyers obtained a court order for Sana's registration as a Jerusalemite, granting her the right to obtain a reunification permit and a Jerusalem ID.

Case 4: Khaled Bashir
This case was filed on 1 December 1998, because Bashir had been trying in vain to obtain a reunification permit for his wife Rudaina since 1994. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove his residency in Jerusalem, and on 1 March 1999, obtained approval from the Ministry to register Rudaina as a Jerusalemite grant her the Jerusalem ID.

Case 5: Inam Ashami
This case was filed on 4 July 1998, because Inam's ID had been illegally withdrawn from her in 1995. She was deprived of her National Security entitlements and her residency in Jerusalem was revoked. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove his residency in Jerusalem. After 10 months, on 4 May 1999, the Center obtained approval for Inam to be given back her ID and National Security entitlements. An application has also been filed to obtain her children's entitlements, as well as another application for Inam's husband to be reunified with his family.

Case 6: Walid Dirbas
This case was filed on 25 September 1998, because Dirbas has been trying since 1995 to obtain a reunification permit for his wife Rudaina. The Center obtained all the necessary documentation to prove his residency in Jerusalem, and on 22 June 1999 the Center obtained approval from the Ministry to register Rudaina as a Jerusalemite and grant her a Jerusalem ID.

Case 7: Yaser Azir
This case was filed on 30 September 1998, because Azir has been trying in vain since 1994 to obtain a reunification permit for his wife Raeda. His children were also denied the right to be registered as Jerusalemites and deprived of all their residency entitlements and benefits, even though Raeda possesses a Jerusalem ID and has lived continuously in Jerusalem since 1993. The Center obtained all the necessary documentation to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 25 February 1999 Center obtained approval from the Ministry to register Raeda as a Jerusalemite and grant her Jerusalem ID. On 1 March 1999, Azir was also able to register his daughter Manar, 4, and his son Arafeh, 21/2, as Jerusalemites, and the family is now eligible to receive all its entitlements.

Case 8: Najah Ashuweiki
This case was filed on 19 July 1998, because the Ministry of Interior has been refusing to register the birth of Najah's daughter, Hiba, and to grant her a Jerusalem ID, even though she was born in Jerusalem, as were all the other family members who are registered as Jerusalemites and carry Jerusalem IDs. The Center obtained all the necessary documentation to prove their residency in Jerusalem, such as electricity and water bills, school certificates and tax invoices. On 5 August 1998, the Center achieved Ministry approval to have Hiba registered as a Jerusalemite and be granted an ID, which she obtained as soon as the approval was issued.

Case 9: Nabil Kiryako
This case was filed on 16 December 1998. Kiyako has been trying to obtain a reunification permit for his wife Jinan since 1994, without success. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 23 February 1999obtained permanent residency approval for Jinan.

Case 10: Hana' Abu Asab
This case was filed on 5 April 1998, because the Ministry of Interior had been refusing to acknowledge the death of Hana's husband during a trip to Romania. She was unable to register as a widow and to be dealt with accordingly by the National Insurance Agency. The Center contacted the Ministry for Foreign Affairs through the Romanian Consulate in Tel Aviv and was able to obtain a death certificate from the Romania authorities to prove that her husband had actually passed away there. The Center also submitted all the necessary documents to prove the family's residency in the city of Jerusalem. On 23 August 1998, the Center obtained approval for the widow's registration as a Jerusalemite. On 5 September 1998, a settlement was reached with the NIA to pay her 12 months' in arrears of her widow's entitlements. The NIA also paid her burial expenses, as is the case for everyone.

Case 11: Wael Al Bakri
This case was filed on 2 October 1998. Since 1994, the Ministry of Interior has been refusing Wael a residency permit and a reunification permit for his wife to enable them to live in Jerusalem where he was born and bred. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 25 April 1998, the Center obtained approval to grant Wael residency in Jerusalem and a reunification permit to Ruwaida, his wife.

Case 12: Dina Hamed
Dina Hamed and her family decided to return to Palestine and settle in the village of Essawieh on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Like Mariam Klambo, Dina applied at the Israeli Ministry of Interior to register her children as Jerusalemites on her ID card. However, the clerk refused to do so under the pretext that her husband had a 'security file' in Jordan which indicated that he was imprisoned there.

Case 13: Alia Shawamreh
This case was filed at the Center on 4 June 1998. The Ministry of Interior has been refusing to grant Alia's husband permanent residency in Jerusalem, although she was born in the holy city and has been living there with her husband for 13 years. Her five children are registered on her ID. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, such as electricity and water bills, school certificates, tax invoices and a rent lease in the Jerusalem suburb of Shu'fat. On 4 May, the Center was able to obtain an approval to grant the husband residency in Jerusalem and a reunification permit for all the family members.

Case 14: Manal Hirbawi
This case was filed at the Center on 7 January 1999. Manal applied to the Ministry of Interior for her son's entitlements and for her husband's reunification permit as a Jerusalemite. Manal argued that she had been living in Jerusalem before and since her marriage. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove residency in Jerusalem, and on 3 March 1999 obtained approval to register her son, Jalal, on her ID and to have the NIA pay the family its entitlements. On 18 July 1999, the Center also obtained approval to grant the husband residency in Jerusalem and a reunification permit for all the family members.

Case 15: Bahjat Asayuri
This case was filed at the Center on 1 July 1999. Bahjat has been trying unsuccessfully to obtain a reunification permit for his wife, Nivine, since 1995. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 1 August 1999 obtained permanent residency approval for Bahjat's wife, Nivine.

Case 16: Maha Al Halawani
This case was filed at the Center on 15 October 1998. The National Insurance Agency has refused to grant her five children, four boys and a girl, their entitlements. Maha is ill but she has managed to get treatment in the Jerusalem medical centers. However, Maha she has been trying in vain to obtain her children's entitlements and a reunification permit for several years. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 27 July 1999 obtained approval to have her children registered as Jerusalemites and granted birth certificates. The children are Inas, 13, Bilal, 10, Anas, 9, Islam, 7 and Ahmad, 4. Maha's husband's case is still being followed up by the Center, but all the required documents have been submitted.

Case 17: Imad Mu'nes
This case was filed at the Center on 12 November 1998. Imad has long been trying to obtain a reunification permit for his wife, Sarah, without success. The Center obtained all the necessary documents to prove their residency in Jerusalem, and on 23 May 1999 obtained approval to register Imad's wife as a Jerusalemite and grant her a Jerusalem ID.

Cases related to the Arnona Tax

Case 18: Moussa Ma'touk
This case was filed at the Center on 27 October 1998. Ma'touk accrued huge tax debts over the years because he was not paying his Arnona tax, but the sum now demanded by the authorities is astronomical and unrealistic. These taxes accumulated without prior notification or any consideration for his financial conditions. He was believed to own a small shop and a house in the Old City, but the shop had been closed since 1975 because it needed maintenance and renovation that he could not afford to pay for. In 1997, a court ruled in absentia to strip him of his property in order to cover the 24,517 NIS that he owed to the municipality. The Center intervened on his behalf, arguing that there is no legal justification for the sum owed. The lawyers were able to obtain a court order for the cessation of all procedures against Ma'touk. On 11 February 1999, the lawyers also obtained an order to annul the 1997 order that demanded the seizure of his property. The order reaffirmed Ma'touk's right to defend himself, be exempted from paying the money he had already paid, and demand the Municipality's lawyer to repay these sums including the interest.

Case 19: Suleiman Mashahra
This case was filed at the Center on 18 April 1998. Mashahra was requested to pay a sum of money in Arnona tax on his house which, ironically, had been demolished by the Israeli authorities two years previously. The sum demanded was 5,693 NIS, in addition to lawyer's fees. The Center intervened and proved that the house had been demolished. On 14 June 1999, the Center filed a complaint at the Jerusalem Magistrate Court demanding the annulment of all measures taken by the municipality against Mashahra including debts pending and the 2000 NIS legal fees. The municipality paid 87 NIS and the whole case was dismissed.

Case 20: Khaled Idris
This case was filed at the Center on 3 August 1998. A court decision ordered the seizure of Idris' property under the pretext that he had not paid the municipality legal fees. On 12 August 1998, the Center filed a complaint that the seizure had been illegal. On 29 November 1999, the Center obtained a court order for the annulment of all pending fees and the payment in installments of the rest of the remaining sum of 700 NIS.

Case 21: The Al Quds Cinema
This case was filed at the Center on 1 October 1998 on behalf of the Society for Arab Studies. The municipality has accumulated 1,070,972.85 NIS in pending debts over the past few years. The Center intervened and appealed against the decision. On 23 December 1998, the Center was able to annul the debt. Moreover, the Center is currently involved in the process of annulling the debt of 130,000 NIS when lawyers argued that it was not possible to keep the debts pending when the cinema had been closed for a long time due to bad economic conditions.

Case 22: Samer Abu Ghazaleh This case was filed at the Center on 4 January 1999. The Bailiff office raided Abu Ghazaleh's house and seized his furniture and property because he had not been able to pay the Aarnona tax. The Center intervened and sought to prove the illegality of the action against Abu Gghazaleh especially as he had never been notified. Moreover, it was proved that the furniture in question did not in fact belong to him or to his father. On 12 March 1998, the Center was able to obtain a court order demanding the revocation of all measures against Aabu Ghazaleh and allowing him to retain his possessions.

Case 23: Zahra Anabulsi
This case was filed at the Center on 10 April 1998. The municipality requested the sum of 78,000 NIS in pending debts from the past few years. Zahra has shown that, as an old woman of 83 who has been living alone, she was unable to pay the money. The Center intervened to prove the illegality of the action against Zahra. An agreement was finally reached between the two lawyers for her to pay the sum in monthly installments of 50 NIS starting from 28 February 1999. The Center did its best to revoke the sum because the woman was so old.

Case 24: Zeidan Burqan
This case was filed at the Center on 29 December 1998. The municipality has requested the sum of 4,300 NIS in pending debts from the past few years. Burqan is physically handicapped and lodged several applications to the municipality to exempt him or reduce the sum of money owed, but without success. The Center proved that Zeidan was physically handicapped and sought to prove the illegality of the action against Zeidan. A settlement was reached to reduce the sum to 1600 NIS, to be paid in 8 installments without interest.

Case 25: Jamil Malkieh
The case was filed at the Center on 18 October 1998. The bailiff's office, on behalf of the municipality, raided Malkieh's house and seized his electrical equipment because he had not paid 1,200 NIS in Arnona tax. Upon examining Malkieh's file, it was found that the signature proving that he had received notification had in fact been forged. A final settlement was reached with the municipality's lawyer to return the electrical equipment and reduce the sum owed to 300 NIS.

Case 26: Awad Ahmad
This case was filed at the Center on 15 March 1998. The bailiff's office, on behalf of the municipality, was ordered to seize Awad's property because he had failed to pay the sum of 6,508.45 NIS in pending debts to the Arnona tax authority. The Center intervened to reach a settlement. On 19 March 1998, the municipality withdrew its case and agreed to revoke all procedures against Awad. The municipality's legal fees were also reduced from 2,700 to 1,200 NIS.

Case 27: Anwar Abul Hawa
The case was filed at the Center on 5 May 1998. The bailiff's office, on behalf of the municipality, raided Aanwar's shop and seized a number of faxes, telephones and computers because, according to the municipality, he had accumulated debts of 17,808 NIS to the Arnona tax authority. These taxes accumulated without any notification or consideration of his financial situation. The Center applied for a revocation of the seizure and all other procedures. On 5 December 1998, the Center obtained a court order for the revocation of the seizure, allowing Anwar to retain his possessions. The lawyer's fees were reduced from 7,000 NIS to 1,500 NISwhich it was agreed could be paid in installments. Anwar's possessions were returned to him on 12 November 1998.

Case 28: Abdil Qader Mustafa
The case was filed at the Center on 5 June 1998. The bailiff's office, on behalf of the municipality, was ordered to seize Mustafa's property because he had failed to pay the pending debts to the Arnona tax authority. The Center intervened and found out that Abdil Qader had never been notified of the debt. The Center proved this in court and the previous decision was revoked. Another hearing was scheduled for 13 July 1998. A settlement was finally reached between the two opponents, reducing the lawyer's fees from 3,000 to 1,000 NIS, to be paid in three installments from 15 August 1998.

Case 29: Ziad Abu Zayyad
The case was filed at the Center on 10 June 1999. The municipality had ordered a raid of Ziad's office because he had not paid a tax debt of 14,453 NIS for the years 1998 and 1999. The Center intervened to revoke the seizure decision and to stop all adverse measures against Ziad. On 17 June 1999, the Center was able to obtain approval to revoke the decisions. On 13 July 1999, the Center petitioned to annul the debts by arguing that the office had been closed during the period for which payment of the taxes was due. However, the petition was rejected under the pretext that closed premises are not exempt from payment. A final settlement was reached in which the money would be paid in 4 installments.

Cases of Home demolitions

Case 30: Fayez Dabash
The case was filed at the Center on 25 June 1998. A demolition notification had been issued by the municipality on 23 March 1998 under the pretext of non-licensed construction. The house, made up of two floors, is 255 sq. meters and was supposed to shelter 14 family members. A fine of 140,000 NIS was imposed by the municipality, in addition to the punishment of demolition. A year later, after a number of meetings with municipality officials, the Center reached a settlement in which the fine would be reduced to 90,000 NIS, to be paid in 90 installments starting from 10 June 1999, and to postpone the demolition until 10 October 2000. The court endorsed the settlement. It should be noted that the Dabash family has suffered a number of setbacks because of the recent death of the father, the main breadwinner, and the suffering of the mother from chronic heart disease and diabetes. Two of the family members for whom Fayez is responsible also suffered from chronic illness that resulted in their untimely death. Due to these difficulties, Fayez had to leave school at an early age to start working and provide financial support for the rest of the family.

Case 31: Aminah Al Huneiti
The case was filed at the Center on 9 August 1998. Aminah had been fined 50,000 NIS for building a house on the Mount of Olives. By mid 1999, she had already paid 20,000 NIS, but the Israeli police, under the pretext of Aminah's inability to pay the remaining sum, raided her house and had her detained in accordance with a court order demanding her detention and an increase of the fine to 60, 000 NIS. The Center intervened on her behalf and on 12 August 1999, the Center was able to obtain a revocation of the court order and settle the issue of the debts, which were reduced to 30, 000 NIS. Aminah committed herself to pay the sum of 8,900 NIS before 1 September 1999.

Case 32: Ibrahim Abu Teir
The case was filed at the Center on 26 June 1998. A demolition order against Abu Teir's 86 sq-meter two storey house and a fine of 140,000 NIS were issued on 27 April 1998 by the municipality. Abu Teir had built his house without a license, but the demolition order was issued in absentia. The Center intervened and succeeded in postponing the hearing from 5 July to 27 July 1998, in order to allow more time for the preparation of the defense. The Center tried to negotiate with the municipality's lawyer before the hearing, but the negotiations were not successful. On 27 July, the hearing took place and a settlement was reached to reduce the fine to 40,000 from 140, 000 NIS, to be paid in 57 interest-free installments of 700 NIS per month, starting from 25 October 1998. The settlement was endorsed by the court. On the same date, an agreement was also reached to postpone the demolition for 18 months, during which Abu Teir will try to obtain a license for his house.

Other general issues and legal campaigns

In addition to the cases at courts, the Jerusalem Center for Social and Economic Rights adopted a number of cases of public interest related to bad services, discriminatory measures taken against Arab Jerusalemites, and the transgressions of municipality staff, and the Bailiff's office in particular, against Arab residents of the holy city. The cases rely on a collective power of attorney regarding a specific issue. These cases are described below:

1. Municipality staff transgressions and the municipality's bailiff office
The case was filed at the Center on 15 May 1999. It refers to the transgressions of valid Jerusalem law by municipality staff, including lawyers, especially as staff have often failed to deliver notification to defendants and thus prevented them from preparing their defence. It has been noted that municipality staff have quite often taken the law in their own hands and illegally seized property belonging to Arab Jerusalemites. The Center has compiled a number of cases of such violations and written to Amnon Cohen, head of the Jerusalem Magistrate Court, including the details of a number of cases of transgression. The Center urged the court head to intervene and put an end to these violations. The court head instructed the municipality staff, including lawyers and staff of the Bailiff's office , to follow due legal procedure, deliver notifications and exhaust all possible alternatives before undertaking any further measures. This response, dated 7 June 1998, was addressed to the Center and came in the form of a letter from the Head of the Magistrate Court. However, according to information gathered by the Center, there are still indications that municipality staff are yet to comply with these instructions.

2. Badly-maintained roads in East Jerusalem.
The case was filed at the Center on 21 July 1998 and refers to the bad condition of some streets, in Arab Jerusalem in general and on Wadi Al Joz road (Umra' Al Qais) in particular. The bad quality of this street has caused heavy losses to shopowners and residents. Shortly after the Center's intervention, the street's residents informed us that practical steps have been taken to maintain and improve its infrastructure.

3. Arabic language not used in official capacities
Arab Jerusalemites have been complaining about the use of only the Hebrew language on official application forms and during investigation of their files. The implications of this problem are enormous, because most people have fallen victim to misunderstanding or lack of precision in communications due to their poor grasp of the Hebrew language. On 6 April 1999, the Center compiled a number of cases in this regard and submitted a petition to the Labour and Welfare Minister, informing him that "..these residents of Jerusalem are Arabs who do not read or understand the Hebrew language, the only language used by the National Insurance Agency. Causing people to sign documents they do not understand is illegal and a violation of their economic and social rights according to international agreements."

The lawyers went on to request the Minister's immediate intervention to enforce the use of Arabic as an official language so that people are able to understand the documents they sign and defend themselves during investigations. On 9 May 1999, the Israeli Labour Minister responded to the Center's letter with an admission that there is a problem with deficient services to East Jerusalem. He said that there are "difficulties in providing services, especially in the fields investigated by the NIA." He indicated that he would do his utmost in order to improve these services and provide the human resources necessary to fill in the gaps and improve communication with Jerusalemites. He confirmed that he had already instructed the Director of the NIA to deal broadly with the problems facing Jerusalemites.

4. Jewish tour guides misleading tourists about Arab shopkeepers.
This case was filed at the Center on 10 December 1998. Arab traders and shopkeepers complained about misleading information being fed to tourists about Arab traders, especially in the Old City of Jerusalem, where a number of traders have complained that Israeli tour guides promote a negative impression of Palestinian traders to tourists.

Traders from different parts of the Old City, such as Jaffa Gate, Bab Asilisla and Adabagha, have said that Israeli tour leaders and guides publicly declare Palestinian traders to be thieves, especially those involved in selling souvenirs, and divert them instead towards Jewish traders.

Ziad Al Hammouri, head of the Jerusalem unit, received a complaint on this matter signed by a number of traders. The office communicated the complaint to Ehud Olmert, Mayor of Jerusalem; Ms Ahova Ganour, head of tourist services, and Ya'coub Meshih, head of the supervision department. Al Hammouri urged Israeli officials to take the necessary steps to end the slandering of traders and consider the negative financial impact of spreading racist stereotypes to tourists. On 25 December 1998, the Centre received responses from the Mayor of Jerusalem and the Ministry of Tourism in which they denounced the behaviour and practices of these Israeli tour guides and promised to take effective measures to punish those who encourage discrimination. On 15 December 1998, the Center received a note to the same effect from Ms Ahova Ganour, head of tourist services.

5. Insufficient ATM machines in East Jerusalem.
This case was filed at the Center on 26 December 1998. Arab Jerusalemites have been complaining about the lack of ATM cash machines in Israeli banks which often mean that the residents are forced to go to West Jerusalem to find these machines. The Center has written to a number of Israeli banks urging them to install ATM machines in East Jerusalem. Some of the banks responded positively and installed them to provide the requested services.

6. ID card confiscation
In April 1999, in co-ordination with other local NGOs, the Jerusalem Center for Civil and Economic Rights petitioned the Israeli High Court to reconsider the policy of revoking residency rights under the terms and regulations followed by the NIA and the Ministry of Interior. The petition was submitted against the Ministry of Interior's decision to deprive Jerusalem residents of their right to live in Israel and to withdraw their ID cards. It also contested the Ministry's frequent rejection of family reunification applications submitted by Jerusalemite women.

The prosecution representing the societies and individuals claimed that there had been a marked change in Interior Ministry policy in the period 1994 - 1996. The number of IDs, withdrawn or revoked, and the number of rejected unification applications, have increased intensively. The lawyers argued that the necessary very strict procedures had not been followed in the cases of these people.

The Ministry of Interior rejected the claims raised at the appeal, arguing that there had been no change in internal when dealing with these applications. The court suggested that both parties review all previous applications of that type dating back to the late 1980s and early 1990s. Files from that period have been randomly selected for comparison with current files, and a report is expected to be produced at the end of the process. The court gave its permission for the lawyers to revise the previous files and note their remarks in the report.

Studies and communications

Field survey:
A few months after its establishment, the Center conducted a field survey to study the realities of trade in Jerusalem within the so called Jerusalem borders. The survey included trade, professional and industrial establishments who pay the Arnona taxes. It also included a collection of their numbers, types of trades, dates of business, initiation, number of employees and the types of services provided to them by the infrastructure.

Social and economic study:
The study included an analysis of the economic and social realities of the Arab residents of Jerusalem compared to Jewish Israelis living in West Jerusalem. The study tackled the differences in income, the volume and types of taxes levied and imposed by government establishments. The study was supported by precise and scientific information and was supposed to provide extra information to the Center about the reality of life for East Jerusalem residents, the types of services provided to them and the difficulties they face as a result of the orchestrated discriminatory policies and their ensuing deprivation of their economic and social rights.

Press releases and awareness-raising campaigns:
During the period covered by this report, the Center produced 12 press releases tackling the most contraversial measures undertaken by the Israeli occupying authorities to clear as many Arabs as possible from Arab East Jerusalem and to deprive those remaining of their rights. The Center also included position statements about the illegal regulations that have been newly-introduced by the NIA, which it denounced. The Center released communiqués about its activities.

The Center also allocated a column in various local newspapers to raising public awareness about popular rights and entitlements. The Center also published and distributed a number of translations of regulations and laws issued by Israeli establishments, as well as distributing tax tables published by the Arnona tax authority and statistics on the procedures followed by the municipality's Bailiff office and the NIA.

The Center held seventeen meetings with the public to inform people of recent changes in Israeli law and raise awareness of their rights. The meetings were dedicated to residents of small neighbourhoods, who are particularly vulnerable.

International activities

During the period covered by this report, the Jerusalem Centre for Economic and Social Rights has participated in various international meetings and conferences. The Center sought to win the support of the international community by exposing the atrocities committed by the Israeli occupying authorities against the residents of East Jerusalem (viewed as violations of international agreements and Covenants). The Center's staff submitted various papers on these matters and provided suggestions on how to bring Israel to compliance with international law and the IV Geneva Convention, of which it is a signatory, as well as suggestions on how to provide the Palestinians living under Israeli occupation with protection against these violations.

A chronicle of these activities:




Click
here to go back to JCSER's main page.




All rights reserved, Copyright © 2002 Jerusalem Center for Social & Economic Rights 2001.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Designed By: 
Mutasem A.Hamoudeh